Revitalizing the Traditional Brass Craft Heritage of Hajo, Assam - Community Knowledge, Indigenous Technology, and Safeguarding Challenges

 


Abstract

The traditional brass craft industry of Hajo in Assam represents one of the most significant living craft traditions of North East India. Rooted in indigenous knowledge systems, hereditary craftsmanship, and temple-centered socio-economic structures, the brass industry of Hajo reflects a unique interaction between intangible cultural heritage and local economic sustainability. This paper examines the historical background, technological processes, socio-cultural dimensions, and present challenges of the brass craft tradition practiced mainly by the Mariya artisan community of Hajo. Based on field observations, oral narratives, and technical documentation preserved in the project materials, the study highlights the importance of safeguarding traditional craftsmanship within the framework of community participation and sustainable cultural development. The paper also discusses the decline of traditional trade routes after the Indo-China conflict and the resulting economic vulnerability faced by artisans. Finally, the study proposes community-oriented safeguarding measures involving documentation, training, heritage tourism, digital archiving, and institutional collaboration.

 

Keywords: Hajo, Brass Craft, Mariya Community, Indigenous Technology, Intangible Cultural Heritage, Assam, Traditional Craftsmanship, Cultural Sustainability.

 

 

 

 

1. Introduction

The traditional brass craft of Hajo occupies an important place within the cultural history of Assam and the wider North Eastern region of India. Hajo, situated in the Kamrup district of Assam, has historically been recognized as a sacred multi-religious cultural landscape associated with Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam. Alongside its religious significance, Hajo developed into an important center of traditional craftsmanship, especially brass and bell-metal work. 

The craft tradition represents not merely an economic occupation but a living embodiment of inherited technical knowledge, ritual association, artistic expression, and community identity. The production of brass utensils, ritual objects, musical accessories, and household articles evolved through generations of hereditary artisans who preserved highly specialized indigenous techniques. 

Traditional craftsmanship, as recognized within the framework of UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH), includes the skills, knowledge systems, and practices associated with the creation of handmade objects using local materials and inherited methods. The brass artisans of Hajo exemplify this concept through their continued dependence on manual production methods, traditional furnaces, locally adapted tools, and oral transmission of technical skills. 

The present study attempts to document and analyze the brass craft heritage of Hajo with special emphasis on the Mariya artisan community, their historical contribution, technical processes, socio-economic conditions, and contemporary challenges.

 

LGBI Airport to Hajo

                                                        (Courtesy Google  Map)

 

2. Historical Background of the Brass Industry in Hajo

The development of brass craftsmanship in Hajo appears closely associated with the socio-religious economy surrounding the Hayagriva Madhava Temple. Historical narratives suggest that royal patronage played an important role in shaping the occupational settlements around the temple complex. Land grants and settlement privileges were reportedly provided to Brahmins, flower gardeners, potters, blacksmiths, singers, dancers, and other service communities connected with temple activities. 

Among these occupational groups, the Mariya brass artisans emerged as a specialized community engaged in the production of brass utensils and ritual objects. Their settlement at Mariyapatti became an important production center linked both to temple requirements and regional trade networks. 


Photo courtesy Dr. Sanjib Kumar Borkakoti

Until the middle of the twentieth century, the brass products manufactured in Hajo reportedly traveled beyond Assam through trade routes connecting Bhutan, Nepal, Tibet, China, Korea, and Japan. Products such as traditional ritual cymbals, utensils, and ceremonial objects were highly valued within Himalayan and trans-Himalayan cultural circuits. The existence of these trade relationships indicates the historical importance of North East India as a cultural and commercial corridor between South Asia and East Asia. 

However, the geopolitical changes following the Indo-China border conflict significantly disrupted these traditional trade networks. The decline of cross-border commerce resulted in severe economic setbacks for artisan communities dependent upon long-distance trade. As a consequence, many traditional families faced occupational insecurity and migration. 

Despite these challenges, sections of the Mariya community continued to preserve their craft by traveling periodically to Bhutan and Nepal to produce brass goods locally. Such adaptive survival strategies demonstrate both the resilience of the artisan community and the fragile condition of the traditional industry. 

Muslimpatty, Hajo
(Courtesy Google Earth) 


3. Community Structure and Transmission of Knowledge

The brass craft tradition of Hajo is deeply community-centered. Technical skills are generally transmitted through hereditary learning systems within families and workshops. Young apprentices learn through direct observation, repetitive practice, and oral instruction rather than formal institutional education. 

The workshop environment functions simultaneously as a production center and a traditional educational space. Senior artisans teach younger generations about the selection of materials, operation of furnaces, hammering techniques, alloy preparation, finishing methods, and symbolic design traditions. 

This intergenerational transmission of knowledge forms an important component of intangible cultural heritage. The continuity of the tradition depends not only upon economic viability but also upon the preservation of social relationships between masters, apprentices, families, and community networks. 

Field observations indicate that many artisans continue to maintain strong emotional attachment to their profession despite declining economic returns. Their craft identity is associated with dignity, ancestral memory, and cultural continuity.

 

 

(Photo courtesy Mr. Naimul Ali, President of the Hajo Muslimpatty Pital Karikar Santha) 

 

4. Indigenous Technology and Traditional Production System

One of the most remarkable features of the brass industry in Hajo is its preservation of indigenous technological systems. The production process depends heavily upon manually operated tools, locally adapted furnaces, and traditional metallurgical knowledge. 

The project documentation records numerous tools and raw materials used in the production process. These include bellows, furnaces, anvils, hammers, tongs, chisels, polishing stones, and manually operated lathis. Each tool reflects long-term adaptation to the practical needs of brass manufacturing.

 



(Bhatty Photo courtesy Mr. Naimul Ali, President of the Hajo Muslimpatty Pital Karikar Santha)   

4.1 Bhati (Bellows)

The bhati or bellow is an essential component of the furnace system. Traditionally, it was constructed using goatskin, though modern adaptations include the use of rubber tyres. The device operates through a manually controlled air-pressure mechanism connected to the underground furnace chamber. The operator regulates the fire while simultaneously controlling airflow through coordinated hand movement. 



Aphuri (Furnace) Photo courtesy Mr. Naimul Ali, President of the Hajo Muslimpatty Pital Karikar Santha  

 

4.2 Aphuri (Furnace)

The aphuri is the furnace mouth dug into the floor of the workshop. It is primarily used for heating brass sheets before shaping and hammering. The underground design reflects both fuel efficiency and continuity of traditional metallurgical practice. 


Traditional rulers (cheri), compasses (girhmis)

(Photo courtesy Mr. Naimul Ali, President of the Hajo Muslimpatty Pital Karikar Santha)


 

4.3 Measuring and Shaping Instruments

Traditional rulers (cheri), compasses (girhmis), anvils, and shaping rods are used for precise measurement and design formation. The artisans possess highly developed practical geometry, enabling them to create symmetrical objects without modern industrial machinery. 


Several specialized hammers 

(Photo courtesy Mr. Naimul Ali, President of the Hajo Muslimpatty Pital Karikar Santha)


 

4.4 Hammers and Forging Tools

Several specialized hammers are employed for different production stages, including the matha haturi, ekthengia haturi, kanhesa haturi, and sorua haturi. These tools are designed specifically for shaping round surfaces, internal curves, and heavy brass sheets.

Traditional manually operated lathis 

(Photo courtesy Mr. Naimul Ali, President of the Hajo Muslimpatty Pital Karikar Santha)


 

4.5 Manual Lathis

Traditional manually operated lathis such as xoru kunda and khama kunda are used for scraping and finishing brass surfaces. These devices represent indigenous engineering adapted to precision finishing work. 

 

The technical sophistication of these tools demonstrates the existence of an indigenous technological system developed through centuries of practical experimentation and localized innovation.

 

5. Cultural and Ritual Significance

The brass craft industry of Hajo is inseparable from the cultural and ritual life of Assam. Brass utensils and ceremonial objects occupy a central place in Assamese domestic rituals, temple worship, marriage ceremonies, festive occasions, and community gatherings.

 







Photo courtesy Jayanta Sharma, Mr. Naimul Ali

Objects produced by the artisans are not merely utilitarian items; they function as symbols of cultural identity and sacred continuity. Ritual utensils, lamps, cymbals, and ceremonial vessels are associated with religious practices in temples, monasteries, namghars, and households. 

The artistic forms of brass objects often reflect floral patterns, geometric designs, and symbolic motifs connected with Assamese cultural aesthetics. These motifs embody regional memory and collective artistic traditions. 

The craft industry also contributes significantly to the cultural economy of Assam during festivals and ceremonial seasons when demand for traditional products increases substantially.  

 

6. Economic Importance and Livelihood

The brass industry historically provided livelihood opportunities to numerous artisan families and associated occupational groups. Production activities involve not only craftsmen but also traders, transporters, raw material suppliers, and local markets. 

The industry contributes to the rural economy through small-scale manufacturing, seasonal trade, and cultural tourism. Traditional brass products remain important in Assamese households and religious institutions.

 


Photo courtesy
Mr. Naimul Ali

However, globalization, industrial manufacturing, and changing consumer preferences have affected the economic sustainability of handmade brass products. Machine-made alternatives available at lower prices have reduced market competitiveness for traditional artisans.

 

7. Revitalization Activities

The revitalization of the traditional brass and bell-metal craft culture of Hajo requires a multidimensional safeguarding strategy integrating community participation, heritage documentation, technological support, market development, and cultural education. The following activities are considered essential for the sustainable preservation and revitalization of this traditional knowledge system: 

7.1. Documentation and Digital Archiving

·        Systematic audio-visual documentation of traditional manufacturing processes, ritual practices, tools, terminology, songs, and oral histories.

·         Preparation of digital archives, catalogues, and community heritage inventories.

·         Recording indigenous metallurgical knowledge and traditional design patterns.

 

7.2. Skill Transmission and Capacity Building

·         Organizing apprenticeship programs for younger generations.

·         Conducting workshops, seminars, and live demonstrations in schools, universities, and cultural institutions.

·         Establishing community-based training centres for brass craftsmanship.

 

7.3. Community-Based Safeguarding

·         Strengthening traditional artisan associations and cooperatives.

·         Encouraging women and youth participation in production, design, and marketing.

·         Promoting inter-generational transmission through family and community learning systems.

 

7.4. Research and Academic Collaboration

·         Undertaking interdisciplinary research involving heritage experts, historians, engineers, anthropologists, and designers.

·         Collaborating with universities, museums, and heritage organizations for technical and scholarly support.

·         Publishing research papers, catalogues, and field reports.

 

7.5. Market Development and Cultural Tourism

·         Developing heritage tourism circuits linked with Hayagriva Madhava Temple and surrounding craft villages.

·         Organizing craft fairs, exhibitions, and cultural festivals.

·  Supporting online marketing and geographical branding of Hajo brass products.

 

 8. Expected Outputs

1.       Comprehensive digital documentation of traditional brass craftsmanship.

2.       Revival of endangered traditional products and designs.

3.       Increased participation of youth in hereditary craftsmanship.

4.       Creation of heritage-based livelihood opportunities.

5.       Strengthened artisan cooperatives and community institutions.

6.       Improved visibility of Assam’s indigenous engineering traditions at national and international levels.

7.       Development of educational resources and museum-quality archives.

8.       Enhanced collaboration between government agencies, scholars, and artisan communities.

 

9.       Direct Benefits

9.1 Economic Benefits

·         Increased income opportunities for artisans and traders.

·         Expansion of local and international markets for handcrafted products.

·         Growth of rural entrepreneurship and small-scale industries.

 

9.2 Cultural Benefits

·         Preservation of traditional craftsmanship and indigenous technical knowledge.

·         Protection of intangible cultural heritage associated with rituals and festivals.

·         Reinforcement of community identity and cultural pride.

 

9.3 Educational Benefits

·         Transfer of traditional skills to younger generations.

·         Development of research opportunities for scholars and institutions.

·         Promotion of heritage awareness among students and local communities.

  

10.   Indirect Benefits

10.1 Social Benefits

·         Strengthening of community cohesion and collective identity.

·         Reduction of migration through local employment generation.

·         Increased participation of women and marginalized groups in heritage economies.

 

10.2 Tourism and Regional Development

·         Promotion of sustainable cultural tourism in Hajo and greater Assam.

·         Development of heritage trails and experiential tourism.

·         Enhancement of regional cultural branding.

 

10.3 Environmental Benefits

·         Encouragement of sustainable handmade production practices.

·         Preservation of eco-friendly traditional technologies and local materials.

 

 11. Modernization and Up-gradation Measures

11.1. Technological Up-gradation

·         Introduction of improved furnaces and energy-efficient tools while preserving traditional methods.

·         Training artisans in modern finishing, polishing, and quality-control techniques.

·         Use of digital platforms for product marketing and promotion.

 

11.2. Design Innovation

·         Collaboration with designers for contemporary utility products inspired by traditional motifs.

·         Diversification into decorative, ritual, musical, and lifestyle products.

·         Development of export-quality packaging and branding.

 

11.3. Institutional Support

·         Formation of heritage clusters and common facility centres.

·         Financial assistance through government and cultural grants.

·         Establishment of museums, interpretation centres, and live craft studios.

 

11.4. Heritage Recognition

·         Inclusion of the tradition in national and international intangible cultural heritage inventories.

·         Preparation of safeguarding dossiers for future UNESCO-oriented initiatives.

·         Recognition of master artisans through fellowships and awards.

 

11.5. Digital and Educational Expansion

·         Development of documentaries, virtual exhibitions, and educational modules.

·         Integration of indigenous craftsmanship studies into academic curricula.

·         Creation of online repositories and multilingual promotional materials.

  

11.   Broader Cultural Significance

The brass craft tradition of Hajo represents not merely an artisanal economy but an integrated civilizational knowledge system connecting ritual practice, indigenous engineering, sacred geography, trade history, metallurgy, music, and social organization. Its revitalization therefore contributes simultaneously to cultural sustainability, economic resilience, heritage conservation, and the preservation of the historical identity of North East India.

 





Photo courtesy Mr. Naimul Ali 

Conclusion

The brass and bell-metal craft tradition of Hajo represents far more than a localized artisanal occupation; it embodies a living continuum of cultural memory, ritual economy, technological knowledge, and community identity deeply rooted in the historical landscape of ancient Kamrupa. The study demonstrates that the Mariya brass-working community, historically associated with the socio-religious ecosystem of the Hayagriva Madhava Temple, developed a highly specialized indigenous knowledge system connected with temple rituals, agrarian life, trade networks, and regional craftsmanship. 

Historical evidence and oral traditions indicate that Hajo once functioned as an important centre of brass production whose products circulated beyond Assam through trade routes extending toward Bhutan, Nepal, Tibet, and parts of East Asia. The decline of these traditional trade systems after the mid-twentieth century, combined with industrial production, changing market preferences, urban migration, and diminishing transmission of hereditary skills, has placed this heritage tradition in a vulnerable condition. 

Nevertheless, the resilience of the artisan community remains remarkable. The continuity of traditional techniques, ritual practices, apprenticeship systems, and community institutions reflects the enduring strength of intangible cultural heritage within the region. The study further reveals that safeguarding such traditions requires an integrated approach involving documentation, policy support, community participation, cultural tourism planning, market development, and inter-generational transmission of skills.

In this regard, the collaborative initiatives undertaken by the North East Zone of ICOMOS India and associated scholars may serve as an important step toward establishing a broader framework for the conservation and revitalization of traditional brass craftsmanship in Assam. The safeguarding of this heritage is not merely the preservation of objects or techniques; it is the protection of a living cultural ecosystem that carries the collective historical consciousness of the people of North East India.

 

 

Footnotes

  1. The term “Mariya” in the present study refers to the traditional brass-working Muslim artisan community residing in Mariyapatti, Hajo, Assam.
  2. Hajo has historically functioned as a multi-religious pilgrimage centre associated with Hindu, Buddhist, and Islamic traditions.
  3. Oral narratives collected during the field survey indicate that traditional brass products from Hajo were historically traded through Bhutan and Nepal toward Tibet and adjoining Himalayan regions.
  4. The “Bhor-Taal” is a large brass cymbal widely used in Assamese devotional and ritual music traditions, especially in Neo-Vaishnavite institutions.
  5. The field survey at Mariyapatti, Hajo, was conducted on 22 April 2026 with the assistance of local artisans, traders, and community representatives.
  6. Indigenous metallurgical practices of Assam remain insufficiently documented within mainstream heritage studies and require systematic interdisciplinary research.
  7. The safeguarding framework discussed in this paper follows the principles of the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.
  8. Community participation remains an essential component for the sustainable preservation of traditional craftsmanship traditions.

 

 

References

  1. Kalika Purana. 
  2. Yogini Tantra. Various editions.
  3. UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003).
  4. ICOMOS India. Heritage documentation and conservation initiatives.
  5. Oral interviews with artisans of Mariyapatti, Hajo, conducted during fieldwork on 22 April 2026.
  6. Ali, Naimul. Personal communications regarding the historical development of the brass artisan community of Hajo.
  7. Field documentation and photographic records collected by Dilip Changkakoty, North East Zone, ICOMOS India.
  8. Barkakoti, Sanjib Kumar. Notes and discussions relating to intangible cultural heritage and traditional craftsmanship in Assam.
  9. Bordoloi, regional historical references on socio-cultural traditions of Kamrupa and Hajo.
  10. UNESCO. “Traditional Craftsmanship as Intangible Cultural Heritage.” Paris: UNESCO Publications.

 

                                                                             APPENDIX

 

Rock Inscription of Hayagrīva-Mādhava Temple, 1605 Śaka

               

    śrīśrī-viśvasiṃhaḥ kṣitipatir abhavattat-sutaḥ khyāta-kīrttiḥ |
               
śrīmat-śrīmalla-devo nṛpatir atimatir nirjjitārāti-jātiḥ ||
               
gāmbhīryyodāryya-śauryya-prathita-pṛthu-yaśo-dharmma-karmmāvadātaḥ
               
śrīmac-chukladhvajakhyo vyajani tad-anujo yad-vaśe'śeṣa-deśaḥ ||

                sākṣād rāghava-puṅgavo diśi diśi prakhyāta-kīrtti-vrajo
               
hantāpuṇya-janasya yo vidhi-vaśād yaḥ kāmarūpeśvaraḥ |
               
yo yo'khila-loka-śoka-dahana-jvālāvalī-vāridaḥ
               
śrīmac-chrī-raghudevo bhūpatir abhūt śukladhvajasy aurasaḥ ||

                tasyāśeṣa-jana-prasāda-janakaḥ śrī-kṛṣṇa-pādārcako
               
bhūpaḥ prāptavayā gadādhara-kṛta-prāsāda-ratnaṃ vyadhāt |
               
maṇyākhyāna-girau hayāsura-ripo ratnāśma-mānāspadaṃ
               
śāke vāṇa-vivattithau guṇivaraḥ kākaḥ svayaṃ śrīdharaḥ ||

                                                                                                          1505 śaka

 

Page No 5, Prāchya-śāsanāvalī, Compiled and Edited by – Neog, Dr Maheswar; Publisher: Publication Board: Assam: 3rd publication (September 2008)

 

 

Translation:

“The illustrious king Śrī Śrī Viśvasiṃha became the sovereign ruler of the land; his son, renowned for his fame, was the noble King Śrī Malladeva, possessed of great intellect and victorious over hostile enemies.”

“Endowed with gravity, generosity, and valor, celebrated for his widespread fame, and distinguished in righteous deeds and duties, his younger brother, known as Śrīmat Śukladhvaja, brought the entire realm under his command.”

 

“Like the noble hero Rāghava (Rāma), whose fame spread in all directions, he became the lord of Kamarupa by divine destiny, a destroyer of the wicked and a benefactor who extinguished the flames of sorrow among all people.”

 

“The illustrious King Śrī Raghudeva, the rightful son of Śukladhvaja, became the ruler; he was devoted to the worship of the feet of Lord Krishna and a benefactor who brought happiness to all his subjects.”

“Having attained maturity, this king caused to be constructed a magnificent temple, a jewel among edifices, built by Gadādhara, at the sacred hill known as Maṇyākhya, the abode of the enemy of the demon Hayāsura.”

 

“In the Śaka year 1505, on an auspicious date marked by the constellation of Vāṇa, the noble and virtuous Śrīdhara himself caused this sacred stone structure to be established.”

 

Rock Inscription of Hayagrīva-Mādhava Temple  1605 Śaka | 1683 AD

 

King Raghudevanārāyaņa.

Gait: p 69. Amanatullah Ahmed: op.cit., pp. 121-22. Chaudhuri: ‘Hājor vivaraņ’, Chetanā, IV.8, p.219. Dharanikanta Sarma:  Kāmākhyā-tīrtha, p.91. 

Śrīmacchukla- OR śrīmat-śukla. Hantāpuņyajanasya – Ahmed hanṭā puņyajanasya. Prāptavayā—Chudhuri, prāptavayāh. Śrīmacchrīraghu- --OR śrīmat-śrīraghu-. 

King Naranārāyana of Koc-Behar did not have a son till late in life. Eaghudeva, son of Śukladhvaja, was, therefore, regarded as the heir to the throne. After Śukladhvaja death, Raghudeva on seeing that he had no hope of succession removed himself to Bijaynagar and showed signs of revolt. The old king divided his kingdom along the river Soņkoşh, giving the eastern part, Kāmarūpa (Koch Hajo), to the nephew in 1581 AD, who agreed to pay tribute to, and acknowledge, Naranārāyaņa as his over-lord. That is why when Raghudeva rebuilt the temple of Hayagrīva-Mādhava, found in ruins under cover of a dense forest, on the Maņikūṭa hillock in Hājo in 1583, he calls glory to Malladeva alias Naranārāyaņa, even though he himself is ‘Kāmarūpeśvara’, Gadādhara, mentioned in the epigraph, was the king’s treasurer, acting for some time as regent, while Śrīdhara was the chief artisan. The code of worship of Hayagrīva-Mādhava is contained in the Yoginī-tantra, written about this time, and was modeled on the pūjā-vidhi  of Jagannātha of Purī as found in the  Brahamapurāna. 

Page No 143, Introduction, Prāchya-śāsanāvalī, Compiled and Edited by – Neog, Dr Maheswar; Publisher: Publication Board: Assam: 3rd publication (September 2008) 




0 Comments